Effective details al Qaeda strategy to hit planes in wake of 9/11

Effective details al Qaeda strategy to hit planes in wake of 9/11

Twin Towers picture

Twin Towers picture

Within weeks of the September 11, 2001, attacks, Osama bin Laden was planning follow-up operations to bring down airliners in the United States and south-east Asia, according to a convicted al Qaeda operative testifying in a terror trial in New York.

Saajid Badat was speaking via a video deposition from the United Kingdom, where he is serving a jail sentence for his role in plotting to blow up a U.S. bound aircraft in December 2001.

It’s the first time that an al Qaeda operative has provided such detail about plans to bring down airliners in the wake of 9/11.
Badat testified that a few weeks after the 9/11 attacks, he met with Abu Hafs al Masri, then bin Laden’s right hand man, in the Jalalabad-Kabul area in Afghanistan.

“Abu Hafs asked me to take an explosive device onboard an airplane, a domestic airline [in the United States] and then detonate it,” Badat testified. He was then called to meet bin Laden himself.

“It was just the two of us in the room and he explained to me his justification for the mission,” said Badat.
“He said that the American economy is like a chain. If you break one link of the chain, the whole economy will be brought down. So after September 11th attacks, this operation will ruin the aviation industry and in turn the whole economy will come down,” he added.

Badat was then told to pick up two explosive shoes from an al Qaeda bomb-maker named Fathi. The explosives, he said, were concealed in the soles.
The idea was for him and Richard Reid, a British operative who came to be known as the “Shoe Bomber,” to blow up different planes simultaneously.
Reid tried to blow up an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami on December 22, 2001.

Before leaving Afghanistan in late November, Badat said he and Reid met with 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
“It was as if he was giving me final orders,” Badat testified.

“He just gave us advice on how to interact with each other, how to cont

George Zimmerman free from Florida prison on $150,000 bond

George Zimmerman free from Florida prison on $150,000 bond

George Zimmerman free from Florida prison

George Zimmerman free from Florida prison

George Zimmerman was released around midnight Sunday from a Florida county jail on $150,000 bail as he awaits his second-degree murder trial for fatally shooting Trayvon Martin.

The neighborhood watch volunteer was wearing a brown jacket and blue jeans and carrying a paper bag. He walked out following another man and didn’t look over at photographers gathered outside. He then followed the man into a white BMW vehicle and drove away.

Moments before, two Seminole County sheriff’s vehicles blocked access to the intake building parking lot where Zimmerman was being released. Zimmerman emerged after two public information officers confirmed the credentials of the photographers outside.

No questions were shouted at Zimmerman, and he gave no statement.

His ultimate destination is being kept secret for his safety and it could be outside Florida.

Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester said at a hearing Friday he cannot have any guns and must observe a 7 p.m.-to-6 a.m. curfew. Zimmerman also surrendered his passport.

Zimmerman had to put up 10 percent, or $15,000, to make bail. His father had indicated he might take out a second mortgage.

Zimmerman worked at a mortgage risk-management company at the time of the shooting and his wife is in nursing school. A website was set up to collect donations for Zimmerman’s defense fund. It is unclear how much has been raised.

Bail is not unheard of in second-degree murder cases, and legal experts had predicted it would be granted for Zimmerman because of his ties to the community, because he turned himself in after he was charged last week, and because he has never been convicted of a serious crime.

Prosecutors had asked for $1 million bail, citing two previous scrapes Zimmerman had with the law, neither of which resulted in charges. In 2005, he had to take anger management courses after he was accused of attacking an undercover officer who was trying to arrest Zimmerman’s friend. In another incident, a girlfriend accused him of attacking her.

Zimmerman, 28, fatally shot Martin, 17, Feb. 26 inside the gated community where Zimmerman lived during an altercation. Martin was unarmed and was walking back to the home of his father’s fiancDee when Zimmerman saw him, called 911 and began following him. A fight broke out — investigators say it is unknown who started it.

Zimmerman says Martin, who was visiting from Miami, attacked him. Zimmerman says he Martin in self-defense, citing Florida’s “stand your ground” law, which gives broad legal protection to anyone who says they used deadly force because they feared death or great bodily harm.

Zimmerman was not charged for over six weeks, sparking national protests led by Martin’s parents, civil rights groups and the Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Martin was black; Zimmerman’s father is white and his mother is from Peru.

George Zimmerman free from Florida prison

George Zimmerman free from Florida prison

Earlier Sunday, Zimmerman’s attorney was working to secure the money for bail and a safe place for Zimmerman to stay. But residents in Sanford, where Martin was killed, didn’t expect a ruckus once Zimmerman was released.

City commissioners said they hadn’t received calls from nervous residents. Protesters didn’t show up outside the jail. And talk at one local coffee shop seldom focused on the case.

“It’s just kind of a non-issue now,” said Michele Church, a server at Mel’s Family Diner. “That’s pretty much all anybody in Sanford wanted, was an arrest, so it could be sorted out in the court system.”

On Friday, a Florida judge agreed to let Zimmerman out on $150,000 bail. Defense attorney Mark O’Mara has said there are several options for where Zimmerman should go, but would not disclose any of them. Lester on Friday indicated Zimmerman would be allowed to leave the state if arrangements with law enforcement could be made for him to be monitored. He will be fitted with an electronic device.

About a half-dozen photographers and cameramen camped outside the Sanford jail Sunday, focused on the door marked “Bonds Rooms,” where other people who had been arrested and released on bail exited. Zimmerman had entered the jail about a week earlier after more than a month of nationwide protests calling for his arrest.

“The mood in Sanford has calmed down tremendously,” said Sanford Commissioner Patty Mahany, whose district includes the neighborhood where Martin was killed. “I think now that people are able to see the justice system taking place, even though they understand it’s going to be quite slow, people are willing to just remain calm and really we’re all getting back to our daily routines.”

A spokeswoman for the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office declined to release any information about whether they were increasing patrols or security.

Defense attorneys for other high-profile clients who awaited trial on bail have said Zimmerman should leave Florida and refrain from going out in public. Sanford residents say they aren’t expecting to see him around the neighborhood anytime soon.

“They’ve already said they’re going to move him to a safe place,” Church said. “Everyone has calmed down. That’s all anyone in Sanford wanted, an arrest.”

Meanwhile, Martin’s parents published a “Card of Thanks” in The Miami Herald obituary page Sunday. The note says Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin express their appreciation for all the public’s support since their son’s death. The notice includes a photograph of Trayvon Martin dressed in a hooded sweatshirt, similar to one he was wearing the evening he was killed.

Through trial, Edwards go through next chapter of political soap opera

Through trial, Edwards go through next chapter of political soap opera

On any given day in the fall of 2007, John Edwards could be heard preaching his populist prose to Iowa voters who eagerly packed into lumber barns, VFW halls and Culver restaurants across the state.

His message was less about the two Americas of his 2004 campaign — the haves and the have-nots — and more about fighting for the middle class and ending poverty in America.

The Democratic candidate had spent nearly all of 2007 logging days in Iowa traveling across the state’s 99 counties. He had every reason to believe he could be president. He felt the country would let then-Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama destroy each other and he would rise as the more experienced and safe nominee.

To many voters, Edwards could have been president of the United States. Five years later, the possibilities for Edwards are completely different.

Edwards’ criminal trial begins Monday in Greensboro, North Carolina.

He is charged with six felony and misdemeanor counts related to the money dealings of his failed presidential campaign.

Among other things, the government alleges that Edwards “knowingly and willfully” received nearly $1 million in illegal campaign contributions to hide his pregnant mistress from the public so he could continue his presidential bid. Edwards acknowledges that while his actions were wrong, they were not illegal. He could face up to 30 years in prison.

Edwards met Rielle Hunter in early 2006 at bar at The Regency Hotel in New York City. Hunter approached Edwards, not believing it was him. Later that evening, Edwards and Hunter met again, privately. The man who consistently spoke about two Americas began living two lives.

Hunter describes herself as a filmmaker. Born Lisa Jo Druck, she is believed to be the inspiration of a party girl character in a Jay McInerny novel. The 40-something Rielle told Edwards that she could help his campaign. Edwards hired her to produce a few videos that would present the politician in a more relaxed manner. The videos were called “webisodes” and were posted to Edwards’ campaign site.

In the first webisode, Edwards told Hunter on camera, “You train to be careful, to close off if it feels sensitive, to close off if it feels personal, and I have to tell myself, I’m trying hard to do it. But you know we’re so conditioned. We’re conditioned to say the same things … we’re conditioned to be political. And it’s hard to shed all of that. I can be in the middle of being what feels real and authentic to me, and I’ll get into a little reel, you know, in my head. I can see it happening, and I have to pull myself back out.”

The clip resurfaced later on YouTube.

In the end, four webisodes were made. However, instead of showing Edwards in a new light, the flirtatious on-camera banter only highlighted just how close Edwards and Hunter had become. Staffers began to suspect that Hunter had become more than a videographer to Edwards. That thought was fueled by Edwards’ insistence that Hunter be allowed to travel with him whenever either of them insisted.

Josh Brumberger was Edwards’ chief of staff when Hunter traveled with the campaign. On several occasions, he talked to Edwards about Hunter’s involvement with the campaign. One heated altercation ended with Edwards firing Brumberger, and by the fall of 2006, several longtime senior aides left the campaign amid Edwards’ refusal to end his relationship with Hunter, as detailed in “Game Change,” the book about the 2008 election.

On December 28, 2006, against the backdrop of a city trying to rebuild and revive itself, Edwards launched his presidential campaign in New Orleans. He vowed to strengthen the middle class, progressively end poverty and tackle the longstanding Democratic platform of health care.

But just as the campaign got off the ground, it hit turbulence. In March 2007, Elizabeth Edwards announced she had breast cancer for the second time and it was incurable. The Edwardses wound up continuing the campaign. In the weeks after the devastating discovery, internal campaign polling showed Edwards surging ahead of Clinton and Obama in Iowa.

Meanwhile, when the campaign klieg lights were off, Edwards and Hunter were still on. Over the course of the summer, Hunter had become pregnant. And to complicate things, Edwards was swimming in a pool of bad press — he had received several $400 haircuts and had made a six-figure salary for working for a hedge fund that was linked to subprime lending and foreclosed homes.

Enter Rachel “Bunny” Mellon. The wealthy banking heiress and widow, who was once a close friend of Jacqueline Kennedy, had been a supporter of Edwards since the 2004 election. When she found out about the haircuts, she allegedly directed Andrew Young, Edwards’ personal aide, to forward all bills to her.

In a note to Edwards received by Young, a person described in the indictment as Person C and believed to be Mellon wrote, “The timing of your telephone call on Friday was ‘witchy.’ I was sitting alone in a grim mood — furious that the press attacked Senator Edwards on the price of a haircut. But it inspired me — from now on, all haircuts, etc., that are necessary and important for his campaign — please send the bills to me — it’s a way to help our friend without government restrictions.”

After already contributing to Edwards the maximum amount under law, Mellon provided additional money to Edwards. According to court documents, between June 2007 and January 2008, Mellon allegedly wrote personal checks payable to a friend, hiding that she was giving money to Edwards.

To throw people off, Mellon is accused of falsely listing items of furniture on memo lines of checks such as “chairs,” “antique Charleston table” and “book case.” The checks were made out to Young’s wife in her maiden name and were deposited into accounts controlled by her and Young. As Edwards and Young planned, Young allegedly used the money to provide Hunter with rent, furniture, care, living expense, medical visits and prenatal care.

In total, the now 101-year-old Mellon gave Edwards seven checks ranging from $10,000 to $200,000 from June 2007 to January 2008.

On October 10, 2007, the National Enquirer ran its first story saying Edwards was having an affair. The next day while campaigning in Summerton, South Carolina, Edwards denied the report and said it was “tabloid trash.” With tabloid reporters and photographers chasing Hunter and publishing photos of her pregnant, a second wealthy donor came forward. Fred Baron, a wealthy Texas lawyer who is now deceased, was the national finance chair of the campaign.

Court documents show that from December 2007 to January 2008, Baron allegedly wrote nine checks ranging from $9,000 to $58,000. The money was used for Young to hide a pregnant Hunter from the media, as he falsely claimed paternity for her child. Baron’s money was used to charter a private jet for trips to Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Aspen, Colorado; San Diego and Santa Barbara, California.

Things weren’t faring better for Edwards on the trail. He placed second in the Iowa caucuses and following disappointing losses in New Hampshire and South Carolina he ended his campaign for president on January 30, 2008.

Reporters remained persistent, continuing to ask Edwards if he was having an affair as it was rumored in Democratic circles that he was secretly trying to broker a deal for vice president or attorney general if Clinton or Obama was elected. In February 2008, Hunter and Edwards’ child was born.

On August 8, 2008, after repeated denials, Edwards admitted he had an affair with Hunter in an interview with ABC’s Bob Woodruff. During the interview, when asked if he was the father of Hunter’s child, he responded, “That is absolutely not true.” When asked if there was money paid to try to cover up his affair with Hunter, Edwards stated, “I’ve never paid a dime of money to any of the people that are involved. I never asked anybody to pay a dime of money, never been told that any money has been paid. Nothing has been done at my request. So if the allegation is that somehow I participated in the payment of money, that is a lie.”

While his name was not on the birth certificate, Edwards would eventually claim paternity and apologize for denying the baby was his child.

Following the mea culpa, it seemed that Edwards’ fall from grace had finally ended. But it got worse. In February 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice acknowledged they had opened an investigation on Edwards regarding campaign finances.

By this point, his more than 30-year-old marriage was falling apart. John and Elizabeth separated and lived apart until Elizabeth Edwards succumbed to breast cancer. She died weeks before Christmas in 2010, with Edwards and their oldest daughter, Cate, at her bedside.

Edwards was now a widower and the sole caregiver to his young children with Elizabeth — Emma Claire and Jack, then 12 and 10 — in addition to providing financial support for Quinn, his daughter with Hunter.

For Edwards, life got worse. After testimony from a cast of former staffers, including Hunter, Mellon and Young, who had published a scandalous tell all-book, a grand jury indicted him on June 3, 2011.

Edwards was indicted on six charges: one count of conspiracy, four counts of illegal campaign contributions and one count of making false statements. Each offense is punishable to up to five years in prison and fines, totaling up to 30 years in prison.

At the heart of the government’s case is campaign finance law, specifically whether Edwards violated the Election Act. Established in 1971, the Election Act states that to restrict the influence that any one person can have on the outcome of a primary election for president, the most any individual could contribute to any candidate for that primary election is $2,300.

Prosecutors will argue that Edwards accepted and received contributions from Mellon and Baron in excess of the limits of the Election Act. Court documents detail that Edwards accepted about $725,000 from Mellon and more than $200,000 from Baron. These unlawful contributions were then used to pay for Hunter’s living and medical expenses and to pay for travel and accommodations to keep Hunter from the news media.

Additionally, prosecutors say Edwards concealed from the FEC and the public the contributions by filing false and misleading campaign finance reports.

Court documents conclude, “Edwards knew that public revelation of the affair and pregnancy would destroy his candidacy and undermine Edwards’ presentation of himself as a family man and by forcing his campaign to divert personnel and resources away from other campaign activities to respond to the criticism and the media scrutiny regarding the affair.”

Edwards’ defense is that the money he received from Mellon and Baron was for personal reasons, most importantly to protect his wife who was dying, and to protect his family. He contends that at no point throughout the ordeal did he ever think he was breaking the law.

Experts say the government has an uphill battle. This type of case is considered unprecedented in the arena of campaign finance, as there are many loopholes in the law.

After shuffling his legal team a few times, Edwards is represented by high profile attorney Abbe Lowell. Two additional lawyers from North Carolina will assist Lowell.

The trial is proceeding because Edwards refused a plea bargain that would have given him a few months in prison but would have allowed him to keep his law license.

U.S. District Court Attorney Catherine Eagles has selected 42 potential jurors. The first bit of business on Monday will be the final seating of 12 jurors and four alternates. After that, the trial will begin with opening arguments. It is expected to last anywhere from two to six weeks.

Subsequent to suspension, investigate for Etan Patz to restart Monday

Subsequent to suspension, investigate for Etan Patz to restart Monday

Subsequent to suspension, investigate for Etan Patz

Subsequent to suspension, investigate for Etan Patz

The search for Etan Patz, a 6-year-old New York boy who disappeared more than three decades ago, is expected to resume Monday after it was suspended for “operational reasons,” an FBI spokesman said.

A law enforcement source briefed on the investigation said no evidence of human remains has been found so far in the basement of a building in Manhattan’s SoHo neighborhood where investigators are looking.

Around 2 p.m. Sunday, investigators searching the basement abruptly folded up a tent they had erected to shield them from a nasty rainstorm.

Moments later, two large New York Police Department vans rolled in, obstructing most of the view of the scene. Through a small break between the vehicles, photographers were able to catch a glimpse of something being loaded into the side of an unmarked blue van.

FBI spokesman Peter Donald declined to discuss the reasons behind the search’s suspension. “We’ll be back in the morning,” he said.

Sunday’s developments came a day after investigators discovered a possible blood stain on a concrete wall while tearing apart the basement in their search for clues in the case, a second law enforcement source told CNN.

FBI agents, assisted by the NYPD, discovered the stain by spraying the chemical luminol, said the second source, who was also briefed on the investigation.

The chemical can indicate the presence of blood, but is not always conclusive, according to that source. At this time, the stain is described only as an area of interest.

Investigators used chainsaws to dig out the portion of the wall with the stain, which will be sent to the FBI laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, for analysis to determine whether the substance is blood and, if so, whose it is, the second law enforcement source said.

The basement is about a half-block from where the boy’s family still lives. Etan vanished May 25, 1979, as he walked to a bus stop by himself for the first time.

A carpenter whose former Manhattan basement is the scene of the search said through his lawyer Friday that he had no involvement in the disappearance.

Othniel Miller, 75, who has not been charged with a crime, has long cooperated with authorities and plans to continue to do so, his lawyer said.

“Mr. Miller has been cooperating with this investigation for over 30 years,” attorney Michael Farkas said. “He has continued to cooperate on multiple occasions. And I am going to assist him in cooperating to the fullest extent possible.”

Miller’s daughter, Stephanie Miller, told CNN affiliate WCBS that her father had cooperated with federal agents, saying he “doesn’t have anything to do with it.”

Investigators recently relaunched their probe of the cold case, often described as a milestone effort that helped draw the plight of missing children into the national consciousness.

Missing child case ‘awakened America’

Authorities said both new and old information led them to Miller, a part-time handyman, who met Etan the day before he disappeared and gave him a dollar. Miller faces no charges in connection with the disappearance.

It was interest in the carpenter that prompted authorities to bring a cadaver dog about 10 days ago to a SoHo basement, where Etan apparently had encountered the carpenter, then 42, according to a source with knowledge of the investigation. The dog picked up a human scent in the basement, where the man had a workshop.

When agents interviewed the man about his connection to the basement, the source said the carpenter blurted out, “What if the body was moved?”

Farkas, the attorney, said he will speak to authorities about that alleged remark.

“I don’t know that he asked that,” Farkas told reporters.

Late Thursday, authorities set up a grid in the basement and planned to rip up the concrete floor. They also took out part of the back wall of the basement, an unoccupied area beneath what was once a restaurant.

The floor was “newly poured” at the time the boy disappeared, according to another law enforcement source. It was not dug up during the original investigation.

Miller was picked up by the FBI again Thursday, but is not in custody. He was questioned and returned to his Brooklyn apartment, the source with knowledge of the investigation said.

“We’re looking for human remains, clothing or other personal effects of Etan Patz,” NYPD Deputy Commissioner Paul Browne said of the current investigation. “It’s a very painstaking process.”

In 2010, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. said his office decided to take another look at the decades-old mystery. FBI leads were then culled from that case file, sources said.

The investigation garnered national headlines as authorities splashed the child’s image on the sides of milk cartons in the hopes of gathering more information, then a novel approach.

Etan was officially declared dead in 2001 as part of a civil lawsuit filed by his family against a drifter, Jose Antonio Ramos, a convicted child molester acquainted with his babysitter.

A judge found Ramos responsible for the death and ordered him to pay the family $2 million. He never paid the money.

Though Ramos has been considered a key focus of the probe for years, he has never been charged in the case. He is serving a 20-year sentence in a Pennsylvania prison for molesting a different boy and is set to be released later this year.

A source said investigators want to expand the pool of possible suspects beyond Ramos.

Stan and Julie Patz, Etan’s parents, still live a block away from the scene and wouldn’t comment on the new developments. A notice on the apartment building said, “To the hardworking and patient media people: The answer to all your questions at this time is ‘no comment.’ Please stop ringing our bell and calling for interviews.”

Authorities have reason to think the new search could lead to the discovery of the boy’s remains at that location, though they remain wary after past leads in the case failed to pan out, according to two sources familiar with the probe.

“I hope they find something,” said resident Sean Sweeney, who says he’s lived in the neighborhood since 1976.

SoHo — a Lower Manhattan neighborhood now known for its boutique shops, art galleries and loft apartments — at the time was considered a grittier locale, where abandoned storefronts dotted the city streets.

The boy’s disappearance was thought to raise awareness of child abductions and led to new ways to search for missing children.

President Ronald Reagan named May 25, the day Etan went missing, National Missing Children’s Day.

Groups Push for Naturalization Ahead of November Presidential Election

Groups Push for Naturalization Ahead of November Presidential Election

Citizenship Push 2 Groups Push for Naturalization Ahead of November Presidential Election

Citizenship Push 2 Groups Push for Naturalization Ahead of November Presidential Election

A number of groups hope to add thousands of new U.S. citizens to the voter rolls in several key states ahead of November’s presidential election.

The national push comes after Democratic President Barack Obama has failed to deliver on promised immigration reforms in his first years in office and his likely opponent, Mitt Romney, adopted harsh rhetoric on illegal immigration to win support from conservatives while campaigning for the GOP nomination.

The Department of Homeland Security says an estimated 12.6 million people were holding so-called green cards given to legal permanent U.S. residents in 2010, including 8.1 million people who already qualify for naturalization but have not applied for citizenship. Latinos, considered a Democratic-leaning constituency, account for the largest immigrant community.

Immigrants and other minority voters helped Obama to a comfortable win over Republican John McCain in the 2008 presidential election.

The fastest growing segment of the American electorate is the Latino vote, and within Latinos, we are seeing very rapid growth of immigrant voters- said Matt Barreto, a political science professor at the University of Washington. In the 2012 vote there is no doubt that the settler community will be incredibly pertinent.

The Become a Citizen Now! movement began in March, hoping to help 5,000 immigrants complete the intimidating application procedure to become citizens and register to vote. It is targeting foreign-born inhabitants who have been in the country long sufficient to qualify for naturalization in Massachusetts, New York, California, Florida, Maryland, Oregon, Colorado, Washington, Tennessee, Illinois, Wisconsin and New Hampshire. Nearly 500 nationality applications have been finished so far.

Yenith Berrio, a 40-year-old Colombian citizen who has spent half of her living living in the United States, is preparing for her naturalization test and looks onward to becoming a U.S. citizen and registered voter.

The Boston occupant said the right to vote allows her to contribute in a procedure that affects her and her family. She said the U.S. is a better place for her and her children who are happier right here and could get much better teaching here.

It classically takes just over five months to obtain nationality.

Citizenship Push 2 Groups Push for Naturalization Ahead of November Presidential Election

Citizenship Push 2 Groups Push for Naturalization Ahead of November Presidential Election

Those immigrants that apply for their citizenship before the end of April are likely to be able to vote in this vote in November- said Josh Hoyt, a co-chair of the National company for New Americans.

A divide push by the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic civil rights and advocacy association, seeks to register 180,000 Latinos to vote countrywide. Organizers say the proposal already has registered more than 10,000 voters. The group is conducting the campaign in Florida, Nevada, Colorado, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, California, Texas, North Carolina and online.

When immigrants record, they usually show up to vote. More than 89 percent of registered foreign-born Americans cast ballots in 2008, according to the Pew Hispanic middle.

And their split among voters is growing. Among all electorate who cast ballots in the 1996 presidential election, 4.1 percent were foreign-born, according to Pew. Eight years later in 2008, the proportion rose to 6.3.

While Immigrants have traditionally supported candidates in both major supporting parties, there’s been a recent shift towards Democrats, said Manuel Pastor, director of the Center for the Study of settler Integration at the University of Southern California.

There has been sort of a obvious spin in the last couple of elections toward the Democratic party — but it seems typically because of the way most of the Republican revelry has moved right on migration and the crash that has on the awareness of new settler voters. minister said.

Romney has staked out a tough stance on migration. He favors a U.S.-Mexico border fence, opposes teaching profit to illegal immigrants and says he would veto the Dream Act, which would allow some illegal migrant youths to earn everlasting residency and eventually nationality if they concentrate college or serve in the military.

Obama had promised during his 2008 campaign to depress for a comprehensive immigration policy repair that would comprise providing a path to corroboration for millions of illegal immigrants. Yet, more than three years into his term, he has unsuccessful to deliver, blaming violently alienated congressional Republicans who he says are reluctant to work on the matter.

Report: Wal-Mart hushed up bribe network in Mexico

Report: Wal-Mart hushed up bribe network in Mexico

Report: Wal-Mart hushed up bribe network in Mexico

Report: Wal-Mart hushed up bribe network in Mexico

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. hushed up a vast dishonesty movement that top executives of its Mexican subsidiary carried out to assemble stores across that country, according to a accessible report.

the New York Times report Saturday that Wal-Mart failed to notify law enforcement officials even after its own investigators found proof of millions of dollars in bribes. The newspaper said the corporation shut down its interior probe in spite of a report by its lead researcher that Mexican and U.S. laws likely were desecrated.

The corruption campaign was reported to have first come to the concentration of senior executives at Wal-Mart in 2005, when a former management of its principal foreign subsidiary, Wal-Mart de Mexico, provided widespread details of a bribery movement it had orchestrated to win market governance.

The Mexican supervisory, previously the lawyer in incriminate of obtaining assembly permits, said in emails and follow-up conversations that Wal-Mart de Mexico paid bribes to obtain permits throughout the nation in its rush to build stores countrywide, the Times reported.

Wal-Mart’s enlargement in Mexico has been so quick that one of every five Wal-Mart provisions now is in that country. It is Mexico’s biggest personal employer, with 209,000 employees there.

The newspaper said that only after knowledge of its examination did Wal-Mart inform the U.S. fairness Department in December 2011 that it had begun an interior investigation into likely violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Under that law, it is illegal for U.S. corporation and their subsidiaries to bribe overseas officials.

Wal-Mart, which is based in Bentonville, Ark., said Saturday that it takes fulfillment with that law very gravely. It also noted that many of the supposed behavior in the Times article occurred more than six years ago.

If these allegations are true, it is not a likeness of who we are or what we stand for, presenter David Tovar said. We are deeply worried by these allegations and are working aggressively to resolve what happened.

The Times said its examination exposed a lengthy resist at the highest levels of Wal-Mart, pitting the company’s promise to high moral and principled principles alongside its relentless detection of growth.

Wal-Mart had sent investigators to Mexico City, where the newspaper account said they quickly exposed evidence that incorporated a paper trail of hundreds of suppose expenditure totaling more than $24 million.

But according to the Times, top Wal-Mart executives kept quiet about the movement and were more alert on damage manage than on exposing the dishonesty. Then-CEO H. Lee Scott Jr. reportedly rebuked interior investigators at one gathering for being overly violent. Shortly thereafter, the newspaper said, the examination was turned over to the universal advice for Wal-Mart de Mexico, who himself was supposed to have authorized bribes. He swiftly exonerated his fellow executives.

How will leaked picture impact United States operation in Afghanistan?

How will leaked picture impact United States operation in Afghanistan?

How will leaked picture impact United States operation in Afghanistan?

How will leaked picture impact United States operation in Afghanistan?

On Wednesday, the Los Angeles Times available photos of U.S. soldiers posing with what the paper said were bodies of insurgents in Afghanistan.

The newspaper said a warrior came forward with the descriptions to draw notice to the security risk associated with a decline in management and discipline. In the Times story, editor Davan Maharaj said publishing the photos would fulfill our compulsion to readers to account vigorously and impartially on all aspects of the American mission in Afghanistan, including the assertion that the images replicate a breakdown in unit regulation that was endangering U.S. troops.

The Los Angeles Times said efforts to get responses from the soldiers disturbed were unsuccessful. CNN has not independently authentic the photos.

The descriptions are just the latest in a string of scandals that some say could damage U.S. efforts in the war, which is in its 11th year.

In January, video recording emerged of U.S. soldiers apparently urinating on Afghan corpses. In February, Afghans rioted after it was exposed that Qurans had been burned in infringement of Islamic tradition at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. Last month, an Army staff sergeant allegedly went on a charge and shot to death 17 Afghan civilians, counting numerous children.

The U.S. is due to hand over organize of the country to Afghan forces in 2014. On Thursday Afghan President Hamid Karzai called for an accelerated changeover of security household tasks to the country’s armed forces. He called the photos merciless and provoking.

CNN spoke with three national defense and military experts about the images and what impact they may have on the U.S. assignment in Afghanistan. Here’s an edited description of their responses.

Read the entire interviews here

Baer: ‘Very, very complicated time stabilizing this country’:

Robert Baer is a former CIA manager who useless most of his career in the Middle East. His book- See No Evil- has been lauded for its first-person look inside the agency and for its analysis of events important up the war on terror.

I think the condition there is going from bad to worse. … It’s incidents like these which are dividing American troops from the Afghans. I just don’t see it getting improved. Of course, this is an remote event. It’s not the end of the world, but if it continues on like this — more bad news — we’re going to have a very, very tricky time stabilizing this country before 2014.

Getting into one of these wars is very easy. It’s very, very complicated for a White House to walk away from this, specially when the same people that attacked us on 9/11 are going to come back. For a politician to say, ‘Hey, let’s not recall about it, let’s hope for the best, let’s leave’ — this is a difficulty for the White House. They cannot be seen to be losing a war. It doesn’t really matter that we never really won the war. It’s just morphed into something else, into a swamp, mutineer warfare.

I don’t think we’re going to velocity it up, we’re just going to hope for the best and get better manage of the military. And hope that the Afghans will be able to take this over. I’m not very positive, though.

Marks: ‘Very damaging to all the U.S. efforts’:

James -Spider- Marks is a retired U.S. military general. He works as a advisor in Washington.

This is very damaging to all the U.S. labors, specifically the U.S. effort to assure it stays in connect with the Afghan government and the Afghan safety forces moving ahead in this critically significant assignment. This does nothing but throw sand into that fabric of trying to institute and trying support what has been, over the last decade, a reasonably good connection. There’s nothing good that comes from this.

Sadly, you had armed ostensibly dehumanizing the opponent. That can’t be done. You’ve got to hold these bad guys with respect that they warrant if they’re willing to kill themselves to realize a goal … our soldiers understand this. These are numerous bad apples. You need to always esteem your enemy, so you better appreciate them.

The record of the military in our conflicts, both in Afghanistan and Iraq, and practice activities that take place every day roughly the globe [have been] decentralized out to young men and women like these folks [in the photos], who sadly made a huge mistake. But most folks — 99% of our forces do a magnificent job. So you have to let the record speak for itself. What you have to do locally — and Gen. John Allen [the U.S. and NATO commandant in Afghanistan] understands this closely you have a lot of damage manage to do. You have to expect what the response is going to be in Afghanistan. It speaks to this remote event, and it doesn’t speak to a full breakdown in terms of confidence and discipline and capabilities in our military. … The military in this case is behind ground because they’ve achieved so many huge things, specifically in Afghanistan, and this occasion is setting them back.

Clark: ‘We’ll get an arranged extraction: 

picture impact United States operation in Afghanistan?

picture impact United States operation in Afghanistan?

Retired Gen. Wesley Clark served as ultimate allied commandant of NATO from 1997 to 2000 in the Kosovo war. Once a Rhodes scholar at Oxford campus, he has a degree in philosophy, political affairs and economics, and a master’s degree in armed science. He served 34 years in the Army and ran in the 2004 presidential vote.

(The photos don’t) symbolize the standards or the training or the standards of the United States prepared forces. Our soldiers and our influential know you don’t pose with dead enemy bodies, and there’s a lot of other things that you don’t do. We preserve these standards. I think the men and women of the prepared forces have done a amazing job, our management has done a remarkable job. No one ever probable when this conflict started that we’d be in it (almost) 11 years later, a volunteer army would have held jointly and done so very well. This is an exemption, and I know the armed will take their proper events.

We’ve talented our major objective there. We got Osama bin Laden. We’ve taken sturdy measures next to al Qaeda — it’s a busted organization, at least as it was in 2001. And it’s not going to recover, at least not in the near term there. There are other enemies on the earth there in Afghanistan, and it’s been a tough brawl. So winning the hearts and minds? I think we can persist training Afghan safety forces. I think we can imagine to fulfill the obligations to Hamid Karzai’s government. I think we’ll get an orderly removal out of that region, as President Obama said, [in] 2014. That’s what we’re actually looking for.

There will be mixed feelings, because those diverse feelings on the ground among the public are expected in wartime. This is a country that’s been through 40 years of war. So, there have been a lot of losses, a lot of disaster, there’s been a lot of hatred. This is one more small piece of that.

Opiates kill 8 Americans in Afghanistan Shown in Army Records

Opiates kill 8 Americans in Afghanistan Shown in Army Records

Opiates kill 8 Americans in Afghanistan Shown in Army Records

Opiates kill 8 Americans in Afghanistan Shown in Army Records

Eight American military died of overdoses connecting heroin, morphine or other opiates during deployments in Afghanistan in 2010 and 2011, according to U.S. Army analytical information.

The overdoses were exposed in documents detailing how the Army investigated a total of 56 soldiers, counting the eight who fell victim to overdoses, on distrust of possessing, using or distributing heroin and other opiates.

At the same time, heroin use it appears that is on the rise in the Army generally, as military figures show that the number of military testing positive for heroin has grown from 10 instances in economic year 2002 to 116 in fiscal year 2010.

Army officials didn’t counter to repetitive requests for comment on Saturday. But records from the service’s immoral examination Command, obtained by the conventional legal group Judicial Watch, provided glimpses into how military bought drugs from Afghan juveniles, an Afghan analyst and in one case, an worker of a Defense section contractor, who was eventually fired.

The drug use is happening in a country that is probable to supply more than 90% of the world’s opium, and the Taliban revolution is believed to be stockpiling the drug to economics their activities, according to a 2009 U.N. study. While the minutes show some military using heroin, much of the opiate abuse by U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan involves direction drugs such Percocet, the Army documents show.

Opiates kill 8 Americans in Afghanistan Shown in Army Records

Opiates kill 8 Americans in Afghanistan Shown in Army Records

Judicial Watch obtained the documents under the Freedom of Information of Act and provided them to CNN. Spokesman Col. Gary Kolb of the International Security Assistance Force, the NATO-led authority in Afghanistan, verified the documents to CNN on Saturday.

One fatal overindulge occurred in June 2010 at Forward Operating Base Blessing, after a soldier asked another soldier to buy black tar opium from a local Afghan exterior the base’s entry manage point. The first soldier died after uncontrollable the opium like chewing tobacco and smoking pieces of it in a cigarette, the credentials show.

The information even show soldier lingo for the drug — profession it- Afghani- dip in one case where three military were accused of using the opiate, the Army investigative information show.

The United States has 89,000 troops in Afghanistan. The U.S. death toll since the September 11, 2001, attacks that triggered the war has risen to more than 1,850, counting 82 this year, according to the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Central Command.

Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said his group was interested in soldiers’ drug use partly because the risk was present during the Vietnam War.

You never want to see news of military dying of drug use in Afghanistan- Fitton said. Our anxiety is, will the military treat this as the trouble that it is, and are the families of the soldiers aware of the additional risk in this drug-infested country?

There is a sprinkled line between the uses. Prescription abuse can easily veer into heroin drug use, Fitton added. Afghanistan is the principal of this opiate manufacture and the enticement is great there and the opportunity for drug use all the more.

The group is worried that there hasn’t been sufficient public discussion, and we would support the management to discuss or talk about this issue more openly, Fitton said.

In one case, a soldier bought heroin and the anti-anxiety drug Xanax from five local national juveniles at numerous locations on Camp Phoenix, Afghanistan, and inspired them, one report states. Soldiers also dispersed heroin, Percocet and other drugs among themselves, according to the information.

Another soldier fatally overdosed in December 2010 after taking numerous drugs, including morphine and codeine, though the drugs were not agreed for him, the Army documents show.

One female soldier broke into the Brigade Medical Supply Office at Forward in commission Base Shank and stole expired direction narcotics counting morphine, Percocet, Valium, fentanyl and lorazepam, the documents show.

The exploratory reports show soldiers using other drugs, counting steroids and marijuana, and even hashish that was sold to U.S. servicemen by the Afghan National Army and Afghan National Police employees, the news state.